KM Malta Airlines codeshare and wet lease: which airline pays?
Short answer: EU261 claims normally go to the operating carrier, not automatically to the airline whose code sold the ticket. On a KM codeshare, read every "operated by" line. In a wet lease, another company can provide aircraft and crew while the flight is performed on behalf of KM, so livery alone does not redirect the claim. Refunds and ticket changes may still involve the issuer or travel agent.
Free eligibility check
Check your case in the form
Enter your route, date and type of disruption. We will check whether your case qualifies for a claim under EU 261/2004 or UK261.
What happened to your flight?
Claim up to €600 for a delayed or cancelled flight.
Choose the situation that applies to your flight:
KM publishes codeshare relationships with partner airlines and says its conditions apply to services operated by it or sold by it as principal. The conditions also require disclosure when another carrier will operate a codeshare aircraft.
This operator guidance was checked on 13 August 2026. Partner lists and leasing arrangements are changeable, so use current travel documents rather than a historic list.
Identify the arrangement
| Arrangement | Typical evidence | Passenger-rights starting point |
|---|---|---|
| KM-operated flight | KM shown as operator | Claim against KM |
| Partner-operated codeshare | Partner shown after "operated by" | Claim against partner operator |
| Wet lease on behalf of KM | Supplier aircraft and crew, KM scheduled operation | Examine which airline performed the flight for the passenger contract |
| Interline connection | Separate carriers on one ticket | Claim against operator causing the protected disruption |
| OTA booking | Seller issues or displays ticket | Seller is not automatically the operating carrier |
A marketing code assists booking and network distribution. It is not the final liability test under Article 2(b) of EU261.
Codeshare example
KM and Lufthansa Group announced a bilateral codeshare allowing one ticket across KM and participating partner flights. KM also publishes a Turkish Airlines relationship in which each airline's code can appear on selected services.
If KM operates Malta-Istanbul and Turkish Airlines places its code on that service, KM is the operator for disruption on that sector. If a Turkish Airlines aircraft operates an onward service carrying a KM code, Turkish Airlines is the relevant operator for that affected sector.
The same logic applies to other partners. Preserve the ticket line for the precise date because partnerships can add or remove routes.
Wet lease is not the same as codeshare
Under a wet lease, the supplying airline provides aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance. The commercial airline can retain the schedule, flight number, ticket contract and passenger-facing operation. Court of Justice case law has distinguished a lessor merely providing aircraft and crew from the operating carrier that bears operational responsibility.
Ask these questions:
- Who decided and published the service?
- Which airline was identified as operator at booking?
- On whose behalf did the supplier fly?
- Which airline controlled rerouting and passenger care?
- What legal name appears on the disruption notice?
Do not send a claim to a leasing supplier solely because its logo appears inside the aircraft. Equally, do not assume KM remains responsible if the documents identify an independently operated partner flight.
Booking-time disclosure also matters. If the operator changed after purchase, retain both the original itinerary and the later notification. EU rules require passengers to be told the identity of the operating carrier, including substitutions. A late change does not itself create fixed compensation, but it can explain why the passenger initially contacted the wrong airline and support a request for a clear transfer path.
One-ticket connections
A codeshare can create one protected journey across several operating carriers. If the first operator's delay causes arrival at the final ticketed destination at least three hours late, EU261 case law may permit a claim against the operator of the disrupting flight.
Keep every sector and replacement itinerary. The relevant distance can run from first departure to final destination on the protected booking, while the respondent remains tied to the operation causing the problem.
Separate tickets do not gain connection protection merely because two airlines cooperate. Check booking references and ticket numbers. The missed connection guide explains the distinction.
EU and UK direction still matter
KM is an EU carrier, but a partner may not be. For an inbound flight from a third country, changing the operator can change EU261 coverage. A KM-marketed flight operated by a non-EU partner does not inherit KM's EU status for that sector.
For UK261, a UK departure is protected on any airline, while an arrival generally requires a UK or EU operator. Read the operator before relying on KM's nationality. The non-EU arrival guide and UK261 guide apply the direction tests.
Who handles refund, care and baggage?
Fixed compensation is directed to the operator. Immediate care should also be arranged by the carrier responsible at the disrupted airport, often through a ground agent. The ticket issuer can remain the practical refund route for an unused fare.
For checked baggage on successive carriage, Montreal Convention rules can allow a passenger to claim against the first carrier, last carrier or carrier during whose segment the loss occurred, depending on the case. Do not apply the EU261 operator rule mechanically to baggage.
If a package organiser paid for the ticket, it may have separate duties to the traveller without becoming the flight operator.
Evidence and claim wording
Attach the full e-ticket receipt, not only a boarding-pass screenshot. Highlight the flight number, operating-carrier disclosure, ticket issuer and affected sector. Add the disruption message, original and actual arrival, replacement route and expense receipts.
If KM redirects the case, request the operator's legal name and transfer details. If the partner redirects it back, provide both responses and ask each to explain the operating arrangement. Avoid letting a carrier identity dispute consume a court deadline.
FAQ
Does a KM flight number mean KM pays compensation?
Not always. A codeshare can carry KM's marketing code while another airline operates the flight.
Is the aircraft owner the operating carrier?
Not necessarily. A wet-lease supplier can provide aircraft and crew while another airline bears operational responsibility for the service.
Who pays after a missed codeshare connection?
The claim generally targets the operator responsible for the protected disruption, with final arrival assessed across the one-ticket journey.
Can the travel agent be the EU261 respondent?
Normally no, unless it actually operated the flight. It may still process ticket refunds or owe separate package or consumer duties.
Does KM's EU status cover a non-EU partner's inbound flight?
No automatic transfer occurs. EU261 inbound coverage depends on the airline actually operating that sector.