easyJet compensation time limit: why one deadline does not fit every flight
Reviewed on 10 August 2026. There is no single current filing period for every easyJet EC261 or UK261 compensation claim. The Court of Justice has held that EC261 court deadlines come from the national limitation law governing the action. easyJet's current terms expressly state six years for Regulation 261 claims brought in England and Wales, while AviationADR referral may be required within 12 months of easyJet's final response. Baggage and other Montreal Convention claims use a separate two-year court period.
Free eligibility check
Check your case in the form
Enter your route, date and type of disruption. We will check whether your case qualifies for a claim under EU 261/2004 or UK261.
What happened to your flight?
Claim up to €600 for a delayed or cancelled flight.
Choose the situation that applies to your flight:
The EU has adopted a future nine-month deadline for submitting a compensation request, followed by 30 days for an airline response. It is not yet applicable on this review date. The amending rules apply only after Official Journal publication and the Council's specified 12-month-and-20-day interval.
Four clocks that passengers confuse
| Clock | What it controls |
|---|---|
| Direct claim to easyJet | Submission to the airline under current procedure |
| AviationADR window | Eligibility for independent UK-connected dispute review |
| Court limitation or prescription | Last date to start legal proceedings in the competent forum |
| Montreal Convention period | Court action for baggage delay, loss, damage and certain proven damages |
An airline complaint does not automatically stop a court limitation period. Nor does a long court period guarantee that an ADR scheme will accept an old final response. Calculate every relevant clock separately.
Current EC261 rule: national law decides
In case C-139/11, Cuadrench Moré, the Court of Justice ruled that the periods for actions under Articles 5 and 7 of EC261 are determined by each Member State's limitation rules. The Montreal Convention's two-year limit does not replace those periods for the regulation's standard compensation.
The possible forum can depend on departure, arrival, operating carrier and contract. A flight leaving Spain may present different procedural choices from a claim issued in England. Never assume that the departure country always supplies the only limitation period, and do not select a favourable deadline without confirming that its courts have jurisdiction.
easyJet's terms currently say Regulation EU261 and UK APR 2019 limitation follows the law of the court hearing the case. They expressly identify six years from the flight date in England and Wales. That is a useful official statement for proceedings there, but it is not permission to wait six years when another forum, ADR rule or evidential problem applies.
England, Wales and other UK forums
Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980 provides a six-year period for an action founded on simple contract in England and Wales. easyJet reflects that period in its current passenger terms for EU261 and APR 2019 claims. UK Supreme Court litigation involving flight-delay claims also rejected treating the Montreal two-year period as the governing deadline for the statutory fixed payment.
Scotland uses a different prescription system, commonly involving a five-year period for relevant obligations, with rules about when the period begins, interruption and extinction. Northern Ireland has its own limitation legislation. A passenger should confirm classification and forum rather than converting the England-and-Wales statement into a UK-wide promise.
Court papers must normally be issued before expiry; sending easyJet a form on the last day is not equivalent. Negotiations may not pause time unless the applicable law says they do or a valid standstill agreement exists.
AviationADR has its own deadline
easyJet currently states that an unresolved complaint may be referred to AviationADR within 12 months of its final response. The scheme lists easyJet and generally addresses eligible journeys departing from or arriving at a UK airport. It also requires completion of the airline complaint process or another scheme-defined trigger.
Record the date and wording of easyJet's final response. A routine acknowledgement is not necessarily a final response, while a rejection carrying escalation information usually is. Check the live AviationADR rules before submission because membership and procedure can change.
Missing the ADR window does not automatically determine the court claim, and an open court period does not revive ADR eligibility. These routes solve disputes under different procedural conditions.
The Montreal two-year period is separate
easyJet's important notices and terms refer to a two-year period for actions under the Montreal Convention. That regime covers baggage destruction, loss, damage or delay and certain passenger-delay damages, not the standard EC261 or UK261 lump sum.
The Convention also has short written-complaint periods: damage to checked baggage should be complained of within seven days, and delayed baggage within 21 days from delivery. Waiting for the two-year court deadline can therefore destroy practical evidence or miss the earlier written step. Use easyJet baggage deadlines for that claim type.
Future nine months and 30 days
The European Parliament and Council completed adoption of amended EU passenger-rights rules in July 2026. The future procedure gives a passenger nine months to file a compensation request and the airline 30 days to pay or invoke extraordinary circumstances with reasons and escalation information.
Those periods do not apply immediately on 10 August 2026. The Council says the updated framework enters into force 12 months and 20 days after publication in the Official Journal. Until the application date is confirmed, current national limitation law and existing complaint arrangements govern EC261 cases.
The change concerns EU law. UK261 does not automatically adopt later EU amendments. A UK departure must therefore be assessed under the domestic rules actually in force at the travel date.
A safe timetable for an easyJet claim
Act within weeks, not years:
- Preserve booking, boarding and disruption evidence immediately.
- Submit the official easyJet compensation form promptly.
- Calendar the court limit under each genuinely available forum.
- Record the date of easyJet's final response.
- Calendar AviationADR's 12-month period if the scheme can hear the journey.
- Escalate before the earliest uncertain deadline rather than relying on the longest possible one.
An early claim also makes operational records easier to obtain. Weather reports, airport notices, app status and receipts can disappear even while a court action remains technically possible.
Examples
England and Wales proceeding. A qualifying easyJet delay claim is brought in a court with jurisdiction in England. easyJet's current terms state six years from the flight date, but the passenger files promptly and keeps AviationADR timing separate.
EU departure with another forum. A passenger leaves an EU airport and considers proceedings in that country. C-139/11 points to the national limitation rules of the court hearing the action; easyJet's English six-year statement should not be applied automatically.
Baggage case. A suitcase is returned damaged. The passenger must make the short written complaint within seven days and treat the Convention's two-year action period separately from any EC261 claim about the flight disruption.
Future travel. A flight occurs after the amended EU regulation reaches its application date. The passenger must then check the enacted text and transitional provisions rather than relying on this page's current-law explanation.
What to preserve if the claim is old
Keep the original booking, operator, schedule, proof of check-in, messages, actual arrival and reason given. Ask easyJet for a copy of the earlier claim and final response if your records are incomplete. Bank statements may show a refund but rarely identify whether compensation was paid.
Before litigation, confirm the defendant, jurisdiction, service address, interest and costs risk. An enforcement-body complaint may help investigate compliance but does not always stop limitation or produce an enforceable individual award.
The easyJet claim process provides the evidence sequence, and the rejected-claim guide explains current ADR escalation.
FAQ
Do I always have six years to claim from easyJet?
No. Six years is the current England-and-Wales period stated in easyJet's terms for relevant Regulation 261 claims. Other courts, ADR schemes and claim types can use different periods.
Does submitting the easyJet form stop the court deadline?
Do not assume so. A direct complaint and court limitation are separate. Obtain jurisdiction-specific advice or a valid standstill agreement when the deadline is close.
Is the easyJet deadline now nine months?
Not yet on 10 August 2026. The EU has adopted that future submission period, but application follows Official Journal publication and the transition interval.
How long do I have to use AviationADR?
easyJet's current terms state 12 months from its final response, subject to AviationADR jurisdiction and scheme rules. Save the final letter and verify the live conditions.
Does baggage compensation use the same deadline?
No. Montreal Convention baggage claims have short written-notice requirements and a two-year period for court action. They must be managed separately from fixed flight compensation.