LOT extraordinary circumstances
LOT Extraordinary Circumstances Compensation: When Can LOT Refuse?
LOT Polish Airlines may refuse fixed EU 261 compensation if it proves extraordinary circumstances and reasonable measures. But a short refusal email is not the same as proof, especially for technical, crew, rotation or vague operational explanations.
A ClaimWinger guide to reading LOT extraordinary-circumstances refusals and deciding whether the claim is still worth challenging.
Start a claim
Check your flight without leaving the article
If this guide matches your situation, you can start with the form here. We collect the route, date, disruption type and documents needed for an initial claim review.
- Initial EU 261 or UK 261 eligibility review
- No upfront fee for accepted cases
- You can return to the guide after adding your details
What happened to your flight?
Claim up to €600 for a delayed or cancelled flight.
Choose the situation that applies to your flight:
Quick answer: extraordinary circumstances are a defence, not a magic phrase
LOT can rely on extraordinary circumstances only when the disruption was caused by an event outside normal airline operations and the disruption could not have been avoided even if reasonable measures had been taken. The airline should identify the event, show its impact on your flight and explain what it did to limit the disruption.
This matters because many refusals use broad wording: "weather", "operational reasons", "ATC restrictions" or "safety reasons". Some of these may be valid. Others may hide ordinary airline problems that can still support a compensation claim.
| LOT refusal reason | Compensation angle | What to ask |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary aircraft technical fault | Often challengeable | Ask what failed, why it was external and why regular maintenance could not address it. |
| Severe weather affecting the flight | Can be valid | Check airport, time window, aircraft rotation and whether other flights operated normally. |
| ATC restriction or airport closure | Often possible | LOT should show the restriction, direct impact and reasonable rerouting options. |
| LOT crew shortage or rotation issue | Often operational | Ask why this was outside LOT control rather than an airline planning problem. |
| Strike by LOT staff | Usually worth checking | Internal airline strikes are different from ATC, airport or security strikes. |
| Previous-flight knock-on delay | Not automatic | The original event, causal chain and reasonable measures still need proof. |
LOT blamed extraordinary circumstances?
Send the refusal wording and flight details. ClaimWinger can check whether the defence looks properly supported.
What LOT should prove before refusing compensation
Under EU 261, the burden is not only to name a problem. LOT should show a specific event, a direct link to your delay, cancellation or missed connection, and reasonable measures taken to avoid or reduce the disruption. This is where many generic refusals become weak.
Ask for practical details: the exact airport or aircraft affected, the time window, whether other flights operated, why rerouting was unavailable and how the disruption reached your final destination.
| Proof point | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Exact event | Weather, ATC, airport closure, bird strike, medical diversion or another specific cause. |
| Timing and location | The event must match your flight date, airport, route and aircraft movement. |
| Direct impact on your flight | LOT should connect the event to the delay, cancellation or missed connection. |
| Reasonable measures | EU 261 requires more than naming the event; the airline should show what it did to avoid the disruption. |
| Rerouting options | Useful when LOT says no alternative flight, aircraft or crew was available. |
| Care and refund handling | Even a valid extraordinary circumstance does not remove care, refund or rerouting duties. |
Technical faults, crew problems and LOT operational reasons
Ordinary technical faults are often treated as part of airline operations, not extraordinary circumstances. Similarly, crew availability, aircraft rotation and general operational planning usually need careful scrutiny. LOT may still have a defence in exceptional cases, but the explanation should be specific.
If LOT says "technical reasons", compare the refusal with the LOT technical fault compensation guide. If the refusal says only "operational reasons", ask what the actual event was and why it was outside LOT's control.
Generic wording is not the end of the case
Weather, ATC restrictions and airport disruption
Severe weather, air traffic control restrictions, security events or airport closures can be extraordinary. But the defence still needs a factual link to your flight. Bad weather somewhere in the network is not automatically enough for every later LOT delay.
Check the date, airport, affected aircraft, route and final arrival. If LOT uses a previous-flight knock-on argument, it should explain the chain of events and why reasonable alternatives were not available.
| Right or issue | Effect of valid extraordinary circumstances |
|---|---|
| Fixed compensation | May be refused if LOT proves valid extraordinary circumstances and reasonable measures. |
| Meals and refreshments | Still usually owed during long waits, even where fixed compensation is not payable. |
| Hotel and transport | Can still be owed when an overnight stay becomes necessary. |
| Refund or rerouting | Cancellation rights remain separate from the compensation defence. |
| Arrival evidence | Still important because the delay threshold must be proven first. |
| Escalation or claim review | Needed when LOT gives only generic wording without proof. |
LOT strikes: internal airline strike or external strike?
Strike wording needs special attention. An airport, air traffic control or security strike is often a stronger extraordinary-circumstances argument. An internal airline staff strike is different and may be challengeable depending on the facts.
If LOT refused because of a strike, use the LOT strike compensation guide. The key is to identify who was on strike, where, when and how that strike affected your specific flight.
Common mistakes after a LOT extraordinary-circumstances refusal
Passengers often stop too early after a generic refusal. Others focus only on compensation and forget care, refund or rerouting rights. Keep the tracks separate and check the deadline before sending repeated informal messages.
| Mistake | Better approach |
|---|---|
| Accepting a generic refusal | Ask LOT for the exact event, evidence of impact and reasonable measures. |
| Treating every weather mention as final | Weather must be relevant to the specific flight and timing. |
| Forgetting care rights | Meals, hotel and transport can survive even when compensation is refused. |
| Ignoring technical-fault wording | Ordinary technical defects are often operational, not automatically extraordinary. |
| Looking only at departure delay | Final arrival decides many delay and missed-connection claims. |
| Waiting too long after refusal | Check limitation periods before the case becomes too old to enforce. |
If LOT has already rejected your claim, compare the wording with the LOT compensation claim rejected guide. If the flight is old, check the LOT compensation time limit guide.
Let ClaimWinger review LOT's defence
ClaimWinger can review LOT's refusal, your route, final arrival, disruption timeline, operating carrier, evidence and limitation risk. If the extraordinary-circumstances defence looks weak, we can prepare the claim in a way that asks for proof rather than arguing in the abstract.
Challenge a LOT extraordinary-circumstances refusal
Upload the LOT email and flight details. ClaimWinger can check whether compensation is still realistic.
FAQ: LOT extraordinary circumstances compensation
1. Can LOT refuse compensation because of extraordinary circumstances?
Yes, but LOT should prove a specific extraordinary event, show how it affected the flight and explain reasonable measures. A generic label is not always enough.
2. Are LOT technical problems extraordinary circumstances?
Ordinary technical faults are often treated as part of airline operations. LOT should explain why the problem was truly external or exceptional if it relies on this defence.
3. Does bad weather always block LOT compensation?
No. Severe weather can be extraordinary, but it must be relevant to the specific flight, airport and timing. The airline should show the actual impact.
4. What if LOT says ATC restrictions caused the delay?
ATC restrictions can be a valid defence, but LOT should identify the restriction and explain why it caused your delay, cancellation or missed connection.
5. Can I still get hotel or meals after extraordinary circumstances?
Yes. The extraordinary-circumstances defence concerns fixed compensation. Care, refund and rerouting rights can still apply.
6. Can a previous flight problem excuse my LOT delay?
Not automatically. LOT should prove the original event, the causal chain to your flight and the reasonable measures taken to reduce the disruption.
7. Can ClaimWinger challenge a LOT extraordinary-circumstances refusal?
Yes. ClaimWinger can review the refusal wording, flight data, route, delay timing and evidence to decide whether LOT has proved the defence.
Legal sources: LOT passenger rights in case of flight irregularities, LOT claim form after departure, Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, Your Europe air passenger rights, CJEU case C-549/07 Wallentin-Hermann, and CJEU case C-28/20 Airhelp v SAS.