AJet delayed, lost or damaged baggage claim
Short answer: Montreal requires proven loss, prompt reporting and a timely written demand; EU261 does not set a fixed bag payment; this finding on legal test controls the analysis of the baggage claim for AJet. A VF service beginning in Turkey does not become covered by EU261 or UK261 merely because it lands in Europe; the Turkish SHY-PASSENGER rules may instead provide a route to compensation and care; this finding on return direction controls the analysis of the baggage claim for AJet; a service beginning in Britain or the EU retains departure-side protection even when AJet holds a foreign licence.
Free eligibility check
Check your case in the form
Enter your route, date and type of disruption. We will check whether your case qualifies for a claim under EU 261/2004 or UK261.
What happened to your flight?
Claim up to €600 for a delayed or cancelled flight.
Choose the situation that applies to your flight:
Open the baggage record before leaving arrivals
Report a missing or damaged bag at the airport and obtain a Property Irregularity Report where possible. Check that passenger name, route, tag number, description and delivery address are accurate. Photograph damage and the report. AJet provides a baggage-tracking channel using the station reference, while any later monetary demand needs a PIR, baggage tag, receipts and the Montreal Convention timeline; this finding on baggage controls the analysis of the baggage claim for AJet. A PIR starts tracing and records the event, but it is not always the later written monetary claim. Keep the deadline for that second step in a calendar rather than waiting indefinitely for the tracing system to close.
Claim proven loss rather than an automatic tariff
Montreal liability responds to demonstrated damage up to its applicable limit; the limit is not a flat payout or minimum. During delay, keep receipts for reasonable essentials suited to location, trip purpose and time without the bag. For damage, retain repair evidence or replacement value and avoid disposing of the item before inspection. For loss, prepare an ownership and value inventory. Case 519 should distinguish original value, age and proof rather than listing only a new retail total.
Keep the flight-disruption claim on a separate track
A passenger can have delayed baggage and a qualifying late or cancelled flight on the same trip, but the legal tests differ. EU261 or UK261 concerns the flight event; Montreal concerns baggage damage and proven expense. An insurance payment should be linked to the loss it covered, and duplicate recovery avoided. On an AJet return beginning in Turkey and ending in Britain, identify which airline accepted the bag, which delivered the final sector and where the report was made before choosing the recipient of the written demand.
Baggage evidence inventory for case 519
- Obtain and verify the PIR reference at the arrival airport.
- Keep boarding pass, baggage tag and original booking.
- Photograph damage, contents and exterior condition.
- Save itemised receipts for necessary delay purchases.
- Build a value and ownership list for missing contents.
- Send the later written claim within the relevant Montreal period.
- Record insurance or airline payments against the same loss.
- Separate baggage damages from any fixed flight compensation.
Send a focused request and choose escalation
Baggage delay, loss and damage are Montreal Convention claims for proven loss (AJet; case chronology 519). They do not trigger an automatic EUR 250, 400 or 600 payment under EU261 (AJet; file 519).
Obtain a PIR before leaving arrivals where possible, keep the baggage tag, photograph damage and send the later written demand within the applicable Montreal deadline (AJet; file 519).
For AJet baggage, the airport tracing reference and the later monetary request perform different jobs. On a VF-operated journey beginning at a London airport and connecting at SAW, file 519 should contain the PIR, tag, delivery or damage evidence, purchase receipts and a written demand sent within the Montreal timetable. Identify every carrier that accepted or transported the bag on a connection. Keep this valuation outside any EU261, UK261 or SHY flight-disruption award, and credit insurance only against the baggage loss it actually reimbursed.
The baggage analysis follows the Montreal Convention and its own notice rules on 10 September 2026 (AJet; file 519). A future EU261 timetable does not replace those distinct formalities (AJet; matter 519).
AJet file 519 should distinguish delayed, damaged and lost baggage dates. Delivery ends the delay period but may reveal damage; a bag still missing can later be treated as lost under the applicable framework. Update the valuation without discarding the original PIR, tag or initial list of emergency purchases. Record the date and channel of the quantified follow-up because the airport report alone may not satisfy the written-demand requirement.
When AJet delivers a bag after the passenger has moved onward, keep delivery messages and any reasonable collection or transport expense caused by the chosen handover method. Check whether home or hotel delivery was promised before arranging a costly alternative. For damage discovered at delivery, photograph packaging and contents immediately and notify the carrier in writing. The new damage chronology should refer back to the same PIR without erasing the earlier period of delay or the essentials purchased during it.
Finish the baggage record separately for every checked item (AJet; file 519). Link passenger, tag, itinerary, PIR, delivery address and the carrier that accepted or delivered the bag (AJet; matter 519). For delay, list essential purchases against destination, weather and remaining trip length; stop the purchasing period at delivery and photograph the condition on handover (AJet; record 519). For damage, keep photographs before repair and obtain a realistic repair or depreciated-value assessment (AJet; case chronology 519). For loss, document ownership, age and present value rather than pricing every old item as new (AJet; file 519). Send the written monetary request within the applicable Montreal timetable and preserve receipt (AJet; matter 519). Allocate insurance payments only to the loss they cover, leaving any qualifying flight disruption on its own legal track (AJet; record 519).
Name the missing record, responsible company and next action in the closing sentence (AJet; file 519). Reconcile the balance with every payment already received, label any estimate and retain the dated calculation used (AJet; matter 519). The result remains actionable without turning an unresolved condition into certainty (AJet; record 519).
Related AJet guides
FAQ: Questions passengers ask about the baggage claim
Does a PIR automatically request money?
AJet: No. It records and traces the irregularity; a separate written claim with loss and evidence is normally still required.
Is the Montreal limit an automatic payment?
AJet: No. It is a ceiling on proven liability, not a tariff paid whenever a bag is delayed or lost.
What can I buy during baggage delay?
AJet: Reasonable essentials related to the trip and delay. Keep detailed receipts and avoid disproportionate replacement purchases.
Can I claim both baggage loss and flight compensation?
AJet: Yes when both sets of conditions are met, because they address different disadvantages; do not duplicate the same loss.
Which airline receives a baggage claim on a connection?
AJet: The itinerary and Montreal rules can permit claims against relevant carriers. Preserve acceptance, final-sector and PIR evidence before choosing the recipient.
Official sources
Sources checked for AJet delayed, lost or damaged baggage claim: